Comparison of ARM vs. RISC-V MCUs

Global electronic component supplier AMPHEO PTY LTD: Rich inventory for one-stop shopping. Inquire easily, and receive fast, customized solutions and quotes.

Here's a detailed comparison of ARM vs. RISC-V microcontrollers (MCUs) — covering architecture, performance, ecosystem, and use cases:

1. Architecture

Feature	ARM (e.g., Cortex-M)	RISC-V (e.g., SiFive E-Series)
ISA	Proprietary RISC (ARMv7-M, ARMv8-M)	Open-source RISC (RV32I, RV64I, RV32IMAC...)
Instruction Set	Compact, optimized, fixed ISA extensions	Modular & customizable (base + extensions)
Microarchitecture	Highly optimized cores (e.g., M0, M4, M7)	Varies by vendor; open to innovation

2. Ecosystem & Toolchain

Feature	ARM	RISC-V
Toolchain	Mature (Keil, IAR, STM32CubeIDE, GCC)	GCC, LLVM, Eclipse, but less polished
Debug Support	JTAG/SWD, CMSIS-DAP, ULINKpro, ST-Link	OpenOCD, JTAG, growing support
RTOS Support	FreeRTOS, Zephyr, RTX, and many others	FreeRTOS, Zephyr (supported but newer)
Libraries	Huge ecosystem (CMSIS, HAL/LL)	Still developing; vendor-specific SDKs

3. Performance & Efficiency

Feature	ARM Cortex-M Series	RISC-V MCUs
Core Performance	Predictable and optimized	Varies widely by implementation
Power Efficiency	Industry-leading in low-power designs	Catching up; depends on SoC design
Interrupt Handling	NVIC, deterministic and fast	Custom implementations (no standard NVIC)

4. Licensing & Customization

Feature	ARM	RISC-V
Licensing	Closed-source, license fees required	Open-source ISA, no licensing fees
Customization	Very limited (IP owned by ARM)	Fully customizable ISA and extensions
Cost	Higher upfront/royalty costs for vendors	Lower cost, better for startups and innovation

5. Industry Adoption

Feature	ARM MCUs	RISC-V MCUs
Market Presence	Dominates embedded systems (STM32, NXP, etc.)	Rapidly growing; popular in China, startups
Use in Products	Consumer electronics, automotive, industrial	Academic, IoT, AI edge, low-cost SoCs
Vendor Examples	STMicro, NXP, Nordic, TI	SiFive, GigaDevice, Andes, Alibaba, Espressif

Summary: When to Use Which?

Use Case	Recommended ISA
Stable, proven industrial designs	ARM
Deep toolchain and ecosystem needs	ARM
Low-cost, flexible SoC development	RISC-V
Open architecture & innovation	RISC-V
Learning, research, or academic use	RISC-V

Comparison of ARM vs. RISC-V MCUs

1. Architecture

2. Ecosystem & Toolchain

3. Performance & Efficiency

4. Licensing & Customization

5. Industry Adoption

Summary: When to Use Which?

Related Articles