What is the difference between SPLD and CPLD?

Global electronic component supplier AMPHEO PTY LTD: Rich inventory for one-stop shopping. Inquire easily, and receive fast, customized solutions and quotes.

The difference between SPLD (Simple Programmable Logic Device) and CPLD (Complex Programmable Logic Device) lies in their complexity, architecture, and applications. Here’s a detailed comparison:

1. Definition & Complexity

Feature	SPLD	CPLD
Full Form	Simple Programmable Logic Device	Complex Programmable Logic Device
Complexity	Basic (small-scale logic)	Moderate (medium-scale logic)
Gates	Few hundred to ~1,000 gates	~1,000 to ~10,000 gates
Typical Use	Glue logic, small state machines	Larger FSMs, control logic, interfacing

2. Architecture

Feature	SPLD	CPLD
Structure	Single-level AND-OR arrays	Multiple PAL-like blocks + programmable interconnect
Macrocells	Few (e.g., 8–16)	Dozens (e.g., 32–512)
Flip-Flops	Limited or none	Many (for sequential logic)
Interconnect	Fixed routing	Flexible global interconnect

Example Devices:

SPLD: PAL (Programmable Array Logic), GAL (Generic Array Logic), PROM.
CPLD: Xilinx CoolRunner, Intel MAX II, Lattice MachXO.

3. Programmability

Feature	SPLD	CPLD
Reusability	Often one-time programmable (OTP)	Reprogrammable (Flash/EEPROM)
Tools	Simple tools (e.g., PALASM)	Advanced (Quartus, ISE, Diamond)
Design Entry	Boolean equations, truth tables	HDL (VHDL/Verilog) + schematics

4. Speed & Performance

Feature	SPLD	CPLD
Speed	Fast (no interconnect delays)	Slightly slower (due to routing)
Determinism	High (predictable timing)	High but depends on routing
Clock Mgmt.	Basic (no PLLs)	May include clock dividers

5. Applications

Feature	SPLD	CPLD
Typical Uses	- Address decoding - Small combinational logic	- State machines - UART/SPI controllers - Bus interfacing
Advantages	Low cost, low power, simple	More flexible, scalable

6. Example Use Cases

SPLD:
- Decoding a 3-bit address to enable one of 8 chips (74HC238 replacement).
- Basic combinational logic (e.g., A AND (B OR C)).
CPLD:
- Implementing a UART transmitter with FIFO buffering.
- Managing a 7-segment display multiplexer for 4 digits.

Summary: When to Use Which?

Choose SPLD if:
- You need simple, fixed logic (e.g., replacing 74-series ICs).
- Cost/power are critical (e.g., consumer electronics).
Choose CPLD if:
- You need sequential logic (counters, FSMs).
- Flexibility and reprogrammability matter (prototyping, industrial control).

Evolution

SPLDs were predecessors to CPLDs.
Modern CPLDs blur into small FPGAs (e.g., Lattice MachXO3).

Practical Circuit Example: SPLD vs. CPLD for a 3-Bit Binary-to-7-Segment Decoder

This example demonstrates the differences between SPLD and CPLD when implementing a 3-bit binary-to-7-segment decoder to display numbers 0–7.

Task

Design a circuit that converts a 3-bit binary input (A2, A1, A0) into a 7-segment display output (a–g) for numbers 0–7.

1. Solution with SPLD (e.g., PAL16V8)

Truth Table & Equations

Input (A2 A1 A0)	Output (a b c d e f g)	Display Pattern
0 0 0 (0)	1 1 1 1 1 1 0	"0"
0 0 1 (1)	0 1 1 0 0 0 0	"1"
...	...	...
1 1 1 (7)	1 1 1 0 0 0 0	"7"

SPLD Implementation (PALASM Code):

a = !A2 & !A1 & !A0 # ... (Sum of minterms for a)  
b = !A2 & !A1 & A0  # ...  
...  
g = A2 & A1 & A0     # Active only for "7"

Limitations:

No Flip-Flops → Combinational logic only.
Fixed AND-OR Matrix → Equations must fit the limited PAL structure.

2. Solution with CPLD (e.g., Xilinx CoolRunner-II)

VHDL Code with Optional State Machine

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;

entity bin_to_7seg is
    Port (
        clk     : in  STD_LOGIC;   -- Optional for sequential extensions
        bin_in  : in  STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(2 downto 0);
        seg_out : out STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(6 downto 0)  -- a–g
    );
end entity;

architecture Behavioral of bin_to_7seg is
begin
    process(bin_in)
    begin
        case bin_in is
            when "000" => seg_out <= "1111110";  -- 0
            when "001" => seg_out <= "0110000";  -- 1
            when "010" => seg_out <= "1101101";  -- 2
            when "011" => seg_out <= "1111001";  -- 3
            when "100" => seg_out <= "0110011";  -- 4
            when "101" => seg_out <= "1011011";  -- 5
            when "110" => seg_out <= "1011111";  -- 6
            when "111" => seg_out <= "1110000";  -- 7
        end case;
    end process;
end Behavioral;

CPLD Advantages:

Flexible Macrocells → Supports both combinational and sequential logic.
Additional Features:
- Pipelining (Output registers for better timing performance).
- Scalability (e.g., adding auto-scrolling with a clock signal).

Comparison Table: SPLD vs. CPLD

Criterion	SPLD (PAL16V8)	CPLD (CoolRunner-II)
Resources	8 Fixed Macrocells	32–256 Flexible Macrocells
Timing Control	No Clocking	Global Clock Networks
Debugging	Limited Test Pins	JTAG, Signal Sniffing
Power Consumption	Very Low (~10 mA)	Higher (~50–100 mA)

When to Use Which

SPLD:
- For static, simple decoding (e.g., replacing a 74HC4511).
- Ultra-low-power applications (battery-operated devices).
CPLD:
- For scalable designs (e.g., future features like display blinking).
- Prototyping or complex state machines.

Visual Representation

SPLD:  
[3-Bit Input] → [Fixed AND-OR Matrix] → [7-Segment Output]  

CPLD:  
[3-Bit Input] → [Programmable Macrocells]  
                   → Combinational Logic  
                   → OR  
                   → Clocked Registers → [7-Segment Output]