Advantages and Disadvantages of PLDs (Programmable Logic Device), What's the Different Between PLD and CPLD.
Global electronic component supplier AMPHEO PTY LTD: Rich inventory for one-stop shopping. Inquire easily, and receive fast, customized solutions and quotes.
Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs) are integrated circuits that can be configured by the user to perform specific digital logic functions. They include devices like PLAs (Programmable Logic Arrays), PALs (Programmable Array Logic), CPLDs (Complex Programmable Logic Devices), and FPGAs (Field-Programmable Gate Arrays).
Advantages of PLDs:
-
Flexibility & Reconfigurability
-
Can be reprogrammed for different applications (especially FPGAs and CPLDs).
-
Useful for prototyping and iterative design.
-
-
Faster Time-to-Market
-
No need for custom ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) fabrication.
-
Immediate testing and modification.
-
-
Lower Initial Costs
-
No expensive mask sets (unlike ASICs).
-
Suitable for low-to-medium volume production.
-
-
Simplified Design Process
-
Uses Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) like VHDL or Verilog.
-
Many pre-built IP cores available.
-
-
Parallel Processing Capability
-
Unlike microprocessors, PLDs can execute multiple operations simultaneously.
-
-
Scalability
-
Can implement complex designs by combining multiple PLDs.
-
Disadvantages of PLDs:
-
Higher Per-Unit Cost for Mass Production
-
For very high volumes, ASICs are cheaper.
-
-
Power Consumption
-
Generally consume more power than ASICs due to programmable interconnects.
-
-
Slower Performance Compared to ASICs
-
Programmable routing introduces delays.
-
-
Limited Resources
-
Finite logic gates, memory, and I/O pins.
-
-
Complexity in Programming
-
Requires expertise in digital design and HDLs.
-
-
Security Risks
-
Bitstream configuration can sometimes be reverse-engineered.
-
Comparison Summary:
| Feature | PLDs (FPGAs/CPLDs) | ASICs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost (Low Volume) | Low | High |
| Cost (High Volume) | High | Low |
| Performance | Moderate | Very High |
| Power Efficiency | Lower | Higher |
| Flexibility | High | None (Fixed Function) |
| Design Time | Fast | Slow (Fabrication Delay) |
Best Use Cases for PLDs:
✔ Prototyping
✔ Low-to-medium volume production
✔ Applications requiring frequent updates (e.g., aerospace, defense)
✔ High-speed parallel processing (e.g., DSP, AI acceleration)
When to Avoid PLDs:
✖ Ultra-high-volume production (use ASICs)
✖ Extremely power-sensitive applications (e.g., IoT edge devices)
✖ When maximum performance is critical
Comparison Between PLDs and CPLDs
Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs) is a broad category that includes Simple PLDs (SPLDs), Complex PLDs (CPLDs), and FPGAs. However, when comparing PLDs (often referring to simpler devices like PALs, PLAs, and GALs) vs. CPLDs, key differences emerge in architecture, complexity, and applications.
1. Architecture & Complexity
| Feature | PLDs (SPLDs: PAL, PLA, GAL) | CPLDs |
|---|---|---|
| Logic Capacity | Small (a few hundred gates) | Medium (thousands to tens of thousands of gates) |
| Structure | Simple AND-OR arrays with limited flip-flops | Multiple PAL-like blocks connected via a programmable interconnect |
| Macrocells | Few (typically < 32) | Many (tens to hundreds) |
| Interconnect | Fixed routing | Global programmable interconnect matrix |
| Memory Elements | Limited (few D flip-flops) | More flip-flops, some with clock enable/reset |
| I/O Pins | Few (depends on package) | More I/O flexibility |
2. Performance & Speed
| Feature | PLDs | CPLDs |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Faster for simple logic (no routing delays) | Slightly slower due to interconnect delays |
| Deterministic Timing | Yes (fixed routing) | Mostly predictable, but depends on interconnect |
| Clock Management | Basic (no PLLs) | Some CPLDs have clock skew control, but no advanced PLLs like FPGAs |
3. Programmability & Design Flexibility
| Feature | PLDs | CPLDs |
|---|---|---|
| Reconfigurability | One-time programmable (OTP) or reprogrammable (GAL) | Mostly reprogrammable (EEPROM/Flash-based) |
| Design Entry | Boolean equations, truth tables | HDL (VHDL/Verilog), schematic capture |
| Complexity Handling | Best for glue logic, small state machines | Can handle larger state machines, counters, and control logic |
4. Power Consumption & Cost
| Feature | PLDs | CPLDs |
|---|---|---|
| Power Usage | Very low (ideal for simple, always-on logic) | Low to moderate (higher than PLDs, lower than FPGAs) |
| Cost | Cheaper (for small designs) | More expensive but still cost-effective for medium complexity |
| Volatility | Non-volatile (retains configuration) | Mostly non-volatile (Flash-based) |
5. Applications
| PLDs (PAL, PLA, GAL) | CPLDs |
|---|---|
| ✔ Glue logic (address decoding) | ✔ More complex glue logic |
| ✔ Simple combinational logic | ✔ State machines, counters |
| ✔ Small control systems | ✔ Bus interfacing (PCI, SPI, I2C) |
| ✔ Basic I/O expansion | ✔ Power-on reset control |
| ✔ FPGA configuration management |
Summary: When to Use PLDs vs. CPLDs
-
Use a PLD (PAL, PLA, GAL) when:
-
You need simple, low-power logic (e.g., replacing 74-series ICs).
-
The design is small and fixed (no need for reprogramming).
-
Cost and power are critical (e.g., embedded control).
-
-
Use a CPLD when:
-
The design is too complex for a PLD but not large enough for an FPGA.
-
You need reprogrammability but not high-speed processing.
-
Deterministic timing is important (unlike FPGAs, where routing delays vary).
-
You need non-volatile configuration (unlike SRAM-based FPGAs).
-
Final Verdict: PLDs vs. CPLDs vs. FPGAs
| Device Type | Best For | Not Suitable For |
|---|---|---|
| PLD (PAL, PLA, GAL) | Tiny glue logic, low power | Anything beyond simple combinational logic |
| CPLD | Medium complexity, control logic | High-speed DSP, large designs |
| FPGA | High-speed parallel processing, reconfigurable computing | Low-power, cost-sensitive mass production |