
What is ARM microprocessor? What is the difference between an ARM processor and a normal processor?
Global electronic component supplier AMPHEO PTY LTD: Rich inventory for one-stop shopping. Inquire easily, and receive fast, customized solutions and quotes.
What is an ARM Microprocessor?
An ARM (Advanced RISC Machine) microprocessor is a type of CPU based on the RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) architecture, designed by ARM Holdings (now part of NVIDIA). ARM processors are known for their low power consumption, high efficiency, and scalability, making them ideal for mobile devices, embedded systems, IoT devices, and increasingly, laptops and servers.
Key Features of ARM Processors:
-
RISC Architecture – Uses simpler instructions, leading to faster execution and lower power usage.
-
Power Efficiency – Consumes significantly less power than traditional x86 processors.
-
Licensing Model – ARM licenses its designs to companies like Apple, Qualcomm, and Samsung, who customize them for their chips (e.g., Apple M-series, Snapdragon).
-
Wide Usage – Dominates smartphones (iPhone, Android), tablets, Raspberry Pi, and modern laptops (Apple Silicon Macs).
Difference Between ARM and "Normal" (x86) Processors
Most "normal" processors (like Intel Core and AMD Ryzen) use the x86 (or x86-64) architecture, which follows CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing). Here’s how they differ:
Feature | ARM (RISC) | x86 (CISC) |
---|---|---|
Architecture | RISC (Simpler instructions) | CISC (Complex instructions) |
Power Efficiency | Very low power consumption | Higher power consumption |
Performance | Optimized for efficiency, not raw speed | Optimized for high performance |
Usage | Smartphones, tablets, embedded systems | Desktops, laptops, servers |
Software Support | Runs ARM-native apps (e.g., Android, iOS) | Runs Windows/macOS/Linux (x86 apps) |
Manufacturers | Apple (M-series), Qualcomm, Samsung | Intel, AMD |
Heat & Cooling | Often fanless (passive cooling) | Usually requires active cooling |
Key Differences in Simple Terms:
-
Power vs Performance
-
ARM: Best for battery life (phones, tablets).
-
x86: Best for raw power (gaming PCs, workstations).
-
-
Software Compatibility
-
ARM needs special versions of software (e.g., Windows on ARM, Apple Rosetta 2 for x86 emulation).
-
x86 runs most traditional PC software natively.
-
-
Future Trends
-
ARM is growing in PCs (Apple M-series, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite).
-
x86 still dominates high-performance computing.
-
Conclusion:
-
Choose ARM for long battery life and portability (phones, lightweight laptops).
-
Choose x86 for maximum performance (gaming, video editing, servers).
Let’s compare ARM vs x86 processors for specific use cases like gaming, programming, and general productivity.
1. Gaming: ARM vs x86
x86 (Intel/AMD) Wins for High-End Gaming
✅ Pros for x86:
-
Better raw performance (higher clock speeds, more cores in desktop CPUs).
-
Full compatibility with Windows games (DirectX, Steam, AAA titles).
-
Dedicated GPUs (NVIDIA RTX, AMD Radeon) work best with x86.
❌ Cons for x86:
-
High power consumption (needs cooling fans).
-
Not ideal for battery-powered gaming.
ARM (Apple M-series, Snapdragon X Elite) – Improving but Limited
✅ Pros for ARM:
-
Great for mobile/cloud gaming (e.g., iPhone, Android, Xbox Cloud).
-
Apple M-series can run some AAA games (e.g., Resident Evil Village, Baldur’s Gate 3) via Rosetta 2 or native ARM ports.
-
Efficient & fanless (long battery life in laptops like MacBook Air).
❌ Cons for ARM:
-
Most PC games don’t support ARM natively (requires emulation → performance loss).
-
No high-end GPU support (yet) like NVIDIA RTX.
Best Choice for Gaming?
-
Hardcore PC gaming? → x86 (Intel/AMD + NVIDIA GPU).
-
Casual/mobile gaming? → ARM (iPhone, iPad, MacBook, or Snapdragon X Elite laptops).
2. Programming & Development: ARM vs x86
ARM is Catching Up Fast (Especially Apple Silicon)
✅ Pros for ARM:
-
Apple M1/M2/M3 Macs run Xcode, VS Code, Docker, Python, and Node.js natively.
-
Rosetta 2 lets x86 apps run smoothly on ARM Macs (~80-90% speed).
-
Better battery life (great for coding on the go).
❌ Cons for ARM:
-
Some Linux/Windows dev tools may need ARM versions.
-
Virtualization (e.g., x86 VMs) is slower unless optimized (UTM, Parallels).
x86 Still Dominates for Some Workloads
✅ Pros for x86:
-
Full compatibility with Windows/Linux development tools.
-
Better for heavy workloads (e.g., game dev, machine learning with CUDA).
-
More RAM options (some ARM laptops max out at 24GB).
❌ Cons for x86:
-
Worse battery life (except AMD Ryzen efficiency chips).
Best Choice for Programming?
-
Mac/iOS dev or web development? → ARM (Apple Silicon MacBook).
-
Windows/Linux dev or CUDA/ML? → x86 (Intel/AMD laptop or desktop).
3. General Productivity (Office, Browsing, Video Calls)
ARM is Ideal for Most Users
✅ Pros for ARM:
-
Silent & fanless (MacBook Air, Snapdragon laptops).
-
All-day battery life (15-20 hours on M-series Macs).
-
Fast enough for Chrome, Zoom, Office 365.
x86 is Still Good but Less Efficient
✅ Pros for x86:
-
Cheaper options (budget Windows laptops).
-
More ports & upgradability (some ARM laptops have soldered RAM).
Best Choice for Productivity?
-
If you want long battery life & portability → ARM (MacBook Air, Snapdragon X Elite laptops).
-
If you need Windows & budget options → x86 (Intel/AMD ultrabooks).
Final Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Use Case | Best Choice | Why? |
---|---|---|
High-end gaming | x86 (Intel/AMD + NVIDIA) | Full game compatibility, better GPUs |
Casual gaming | ARM (Apple M-series, Snapdragon X Elite) | Good for mobile/cloud gaming |
Programming (Mac/iOS) | ARM (Apple Silicon) | Best performance per watt |
Programming (Windows/Linux/CUDA) | x86 (Intel/AMD) | Full tool compatibility |
Office/Productivity | ARM (MacBook Air, Snapdragon laptops) | Best battery life |
Budget Windows Laptop | x86 (AMD Ryzen/Intel Core) | More affordable options |
Future Outlook:
-
ARM is growing (Apple Silicon, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, NVIDIA’s ARM push).
-
x86 will still dominate for high-performance PCs and servers.
Related Articles
- ·Comparison of FPGA, ARM, STM32, and DSP Platforms
- ·Comparison of FPGA, CPLD, PLC, Microprocessor, Microcontroller & DSP
- ·What distinguishes a microprocessor from a microcontroller?
- ·Microprocessor vs. Microcontroller vs. System on Chip: What are the differences among them?
- ·ARM vs. DSP vs. FPGA: Main differences between them